学校代码10702 密级 公 开
中图分类号 F204学号1905210443
硕士学位论文
基于校企合作的高校科技创新
价值共创路径研究
学位申请人：刘璇
指导教师： 张明亲 教授
学科名称： 企业管理
学位门类：管理学
2022 年 5 月
硕士学位论文
题目：基于校企合作的高校科技创新
价值共创路径研究
作者 刘璇
指导教师 张明亲 专业技术职务 教授
学科 企业管理
西安工业大学
2022 年 5 月 中国.西安
Research on the Co-creation Path of
Scientific and Technological Innovation
Value in Colleges and Universities Based
on University-Enterprise Cooperation
by
liu xuan
Thesis Submitted to the faculty of the Xi’an Technological
University in Partial Fulfillment of
the Requirements for the Degree of
MASTER
in
The enterprise management
Supervisor: Prof. Zhang Mingqin
Xi’an Technological University
May 2022
Xi’an, Shaanxi, P.R.China
摘 要
价值共创作为保持创新活力的重要手段，是创新主体之间通过开放协作和资
源整合共谋创新的过程。高校与企业之间的价值共创不仅是提升高校科技创新水
平的现实要求，也是当前更好的实施国家创新驱动战略的重要命题。因此，如何
结合高校自身的定位和特性，破解高校与企业之间的价值共创机理，发挥高校在
产学合作中的优势，成为亟需解决的重要理论与现实问题。
本文转变以往从网络嵌入或双元创新单一因素出发研究高校科技创新价值
共创的问题，考虑校企合作过程中高校科技创新价值共创的多因素交互影响，试
图探寻网络嵌入与双元创新对校企合作下价值共创路径的组态效应。
首先，在搜集、整理和查阅文献资料的基础上，厘清了校企合作中高校与企
业的价值共创过程，认为高校与企业通过“对话”实现“价值共识”；通过“渠
道”实现“价值共享”；通过“降低风险”实现“价值共生”；通过“透明度”
实现“价值共赢”。
其次，基于校企合作这一特定背景，分析了网络嵌入层面的结构嵌入、关系
嵌入和文化嵌入以及双元创新层面的利用式创新和探索式创新 5 个前因条件的
联动匹配影响高校价值共创的内在机理，构建了校企合作中网络嵌入与双元创新
驱动高校科技创新价值共创的理论模型。
最后，参考现有量表设计调查问卷，并对其信效度进行检验，运用 FsQCA
方法进行充要条件检验以及路径分析，得出利用式创新主导型和双元创新均衡型
2 条高价值共创路径和双元创新缺乏型、文化禁锢型和网络嵌入匮乏型3 条非高
价值共创路径。
通过研究发现：（1）高利用式创新是推动高校价值共创的核心必要条件。
高校价值共创的实现路径具有多样性，只要高利用式创新存在，就能够促进高校
实现价值共创。（2）非结构嵌入与非关系、非文化嵌入之间存在替代作用。（3）
促进价值共创的路径和抑制价值共创的路径具有非对称性的特征。（4）网络嵌
入层面和双元创新层面无论在推动价值共创还是在抑制价值共创的路径都是交
织在一起，不能单一层面的对价值共创产生影响。
关键词：价值共创；校企合作；网络嵌入；双元创新；模糊集定性比较分析
本研究得到国家社科基金（编号：19BGL027）资助。
Abstract
Value co-creation is an important means to maintain the vitality of innovation, and
it is a process in which innovation subjects seek common innovation through open
collaboration and resource integration. The value co-creation between universities and
enterprises is not only a realistic requirement to improve the level of scientific and
technological innovation in universities, but also an important proposition for better
implementation of the national innovation-driven strategy. Therefore, how to combine
the positioning and characteristics of colleges and universities, crack the value co-
creation mechanism between colleges and enterprises, and give full play to the
advantages of colleges and universities in industry-university cooperation has become
an important theoretical and practical problem that needs to be solved urgently.
This paper changes the previous research on the co-creation of scientific and
technological innovation value in colleges and universities from the single factor of
network embedding or dual innovation, and considers the multi-factor interaction of the
co-creation of scientific and technological innovation value in colleges and enterprises
in the process of school-enterprise cooperation. The configuration effect of innovation
on the value co-creation path under school-enterprise cooperation.
First of all, on the basis of collecting, arranging and reviewing literature and
materials, this paper clarifies the value co-creation process between universities and
enterprises in school-enterprise cooperation. It is believed that universities and
enterprises achieve "value consensus" through "dialogue"; "value sharing" through
"channels"; "value symbiosis" through "risk reduction"; and "value win-win" through
"transparency".
Secondly, based on the specific background of school-enterprise cooperation, it
analyzes the impact of five antecedent conditions of structural embedding, relationship
embedding and cultural embedding at the network embedding level, and utilization
innovation and exploratory innovation at the dual innovation level. Based on the
internal mechanism of innovation, a theoretical model of the co-creation of scientific
and technological innovation value in colleges and universities driven by network
embedding and dual innovation in school-enterprise cooperation is constructed.
Finally, referring to the existing scale to design the questionnaire, and test its
reliability and validity, use the FsQCA method to test the sufficient and necessary
conditions and analyze the path, and obtain two high-value common types of utilization
innovation-led and dual innovation-balanced type. There are three non-high-value co-